Twenty-third Sunday after Pentecost
In both parts of today’s Gospel, the people go to the Savior for what they want. The official goes so that his daughter might have life. He pleads with Christ to heal her, but after she has died, to raise her from the dead. The woman needs healing, and interrupts the Lord’s journey to Jairus’s house. She does not feel comfortable speaking with Christ, but has confidence that all she has to do is touch His clothes and she will be healed. In both cases, the people go to Christ for what they need, and He provides for them.
In both parts of today’s Gospel, that approach to the Lord is motivated by faith. Jairus has faith that the Lord will heal or raise his daughter. The woman has faith that if she but touches the hem of Christ’s garment that she will receive the healing for which she has long been searching. In all three Gospel accounts, this story is fairly early in the Lord’s public ministry, so this faith is based mostly on the hope for who this itinerant rabbi might be.
The two temptations for us as followers of Christ are to fall into the error of a kind of fideism, which the philosopher Alvin Plantinga describes as “the exclusive or basic reliance upon faith alone, accompanied by a consequent disparagement of reason”; or rationalism, where faith has no role in our lives, and we only follow scientific realities. Now, both might seem like an extreme no one here would fall into, but they can sneak up quite quickly.
In the case of a brand of fideism, we go to God, which is good, but we don’t also utilize what God has revealed through human reason. There are those who refuse to seek medical treatment because faith in God’s healing will suffice, and if God wants the person to be healed, that person will be healed. When someone is sick, we should go to God to ask for the health of an individual. We should have faith that God can do amazing things without any assistance from another, just like in the Gospel. But we should also utilize that gifts that God has given, whether to us or to others, in utilizing the natural sciences to work God’s healing. If a child’s arm is broken, we don’t just pray over that child, hoping that the bone will set itself correctly. We pray for healing, and we take the child to a doctor to set the arm and put it in a cast.
In the case of a type of rationalism, we ignore God altogether, and rely simply upon our wisdom. While this might seem like something we would never do, especially as people who go to church, it can sneak in quite easily and clandestinely to our lives, such that, as we approach decisions, we fail to include God in those decisions at all. We start out from the view that we know what is best, and ask God simply to affirm our decision, rather than putting our decision to him, and leaving space in our life for His will to be done. We allow our reason to take the place of God’s providence, and leave no room for God to act.
St. Paul says in today’s epistle that we should follow his example, and St. Paul was someone who both used reason and relied on faith in God. He avoided the vicious extremes of fideism and rationalism, and took the virtuous middle road of rational faith, leaving room for God and also utilizing his own wisdom. We see this in the trial St. Paul undergoes before he is sent to Rome for Caesar’s decision.
St. Paul had been told by the Holy Spirit that he would go to Jerusalem to undergo imprisonment and hardships. When, on his way to Jerusalem, he stopped in Caesarea, a prophet by the name of Agabus came to St. Paul, “too Paul’s belt, bound his own feet and hands with it, and said, ‘Thus says the holy Spirit: This is the way the Jews will bind the owner of this belt in Jerusalem, and they will hand him over to the Gentiles.’” St. Paul was open to the will of God leading him back to Jerusalem. But, when on trial before the high priest and Sanhedrin, Paul also realized that some were Pharisees, who believe in the resurrection, and some were Sadducees, who did not believe in the resurrection. He used that knowledge to pit them against each other, saying that he was on trial for his belief in the resurrection of the dead, such that the Pharisees wanted to release him, but the Sadducees would not allow it.
Towards the end of that trial, the Lord spoke to St. Paul and said, “‘Take courage. For just as you have borne witness to my cause in Jerusalem, so you must also bear witness in Rome.’” St. Paul was transferred back to Caesarea to be questioned by the Roman governor Felix. The case wouldn’t be decided, as Felix and his successor, Festus, wanted to curry favor from the Jews, no doubt to help keep peace. When St. Paul saw that Festus wanted to send him back to Jerusalem, he invoked his right as a Roman citizen, and said, “‘I appeal to Caesar.’” Festus keeps him a little longer and lets him speak to King Agrippa. King Agrippa, after hearing Paul’s testimony and witness of his faith, admits that Paul had done nothing wrong, and told Festus, “‘This man could have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar.’” But St. Paul knew that God wanted him to witness to the faith in Rome, so he appealed to Caesar, rather than risk the chance of being set free again. St. Paul trusted in God, believed what God had revealed to him, but also used his reason and wit to cooperate with the plan of God.
Our challenge today is to follow the example of Jairus and of the woman with the hemorrhage and of St. Paul: to go to the Lord when we are in any need, and to have faith in His plan. This doesn’t mean that we ignore God’s gift of reason to us, nor does it mean that we ignore God and only use our reason. Rather, we take our desires and plans to God, and submit them to His Divine Providence, knowing that sometimes God will intervene in some way to change our plans to be more in accord with His, and that sometimes God will allow our plans to proceed as we desired. But the key is that we have faith in God, and that we go to Him in any need: to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. Amen.